oops! i meant EPL On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jean-Sebastien, > > Just checked with Cliff. CDDL jars are ok both for inclusion in our > SVN and as part of a distribution. So +1 from me. > > -- dims > > On 4/26/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim Marino wrote: > > > Just a friendly reminder to those working on the core or model to > > > please include celtix in their refactorings. I accidentally forgot to > > > check in my refactors (sandbox is separate) and run the checkstyle > > > tests from celtix/binding.celtix resulting in Dan having a broken demo > > > :-( Also, someone else modifying the loader forgot to include the > > > project in their refactors (I fixed it)... > > > > > > Dan also proposed we adopt checkstyle as part of the build process. I > > > would like to due this using lazy consensus with the caveat that the > > > cut-over be done after the Java One release to avoid disruption and > > > give people a chance to adjust code gradually. The checkstyle > > > configuration is fairly rigorous and we will need to divide up the > > > work to do so by project. > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > Sorry for contributing to the break as well... when I did my latest > > refactoring I didn't have the Celtix binding included in my workspace > > either. What do people think about moving the Celtix binding to the > > main code stream under bindings/? It's getting in a good shape now, and > > this way we'll all include it in our refactoring, testing, it'll be > > loaded in our IDEs etc. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
