I too think that having a work manager implementation that minimizes
dependencies (e.g., Geronimo's)
is a useful thing to have. Wrt using a work manager in the support for
callbacks, we should
just make sure that we are ok with the overall architecture first. At his
point, it looks like the local
case could use a work manager, but not necessarily the remote case. I am
working on a couple of
scenarios (of the technology kind, as Jim refers to them) that illustrate
the main steps so that we can
get a better idea of how the architecture can fit in support for callbacks
in general.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: Support for callbacks
On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
Are you ok for me to start looking at the work manager implementation?
Once I get a better understanding around the requirements of callbacks,
I can try to give some input on that as well.
Meeraj, please do, this would be a good thing to have.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
