+1

On 7/14/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    Hello fellow committers,
    Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
    I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base. I've
    held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't want
    to add any more fuel to the fire.  I now feel I have to speak up: to
    be honest about this,  I was really disheartened that it has came to
    pass that we as a community so soon moved to having to fall back on
    "The Rules for Revolutionaries".  While this seems to be acceptable
    path for a Apache project, I don't feel that makes right for
    Tuscany.  I think there is a fundamental difference in the stages of
    projects that followed that route and the stage that Tuscany
    currently is at and survived as a project..  Many of these projects
    were fairly mature, they had a much larger pool of core developers
    to draw on both sides, they had a much larger user base, and for the
    most part they were based on mature specifications.  I agree that in
    some stages in the life time of a project a revolution is
    desperately needed to bring about innovation.  I don't think this is
    the case for Tuscany,  I honestly don't think Tuscany is at the
    stage where it can quite honestly survive such a split and still
    gain traction in gaining commiters and users.

    I'd really like to request that we as a community once again focus
    not as much on the technology which both branches have merit, but
    consider the Tuscany project as a whole will be better served if we
    make a decision on which will be the future today.  Thus I'm
    requesting as has been asked before if we can't take a vote on one
    and once again move forward together as one.

    Specifcly:

    I would like to propose that we make the chanti tree the main trunk
    and turn the current trunk into a maintainance branch. The chianti
    code would be moved to tuscany/java and would be the main
    development tree moving forward; the existing trunk would be moved
    to branches/M1. Please vote if you agree with this proposal - as a
    policy vote, at least 3 +1s and more +1's than -1's would be needed
    to do this

    This is my +1 for this.

    Thanks
    Rick


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to