I can go ahead and convert them to the SVG format.Actually, I believe I attached the SVG formated diagram in the original zip...
On 7/26/06, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't find an way to conver viso to open office that works. Tried most of the suggestions I can find on the web. However the diagrams are not so complicated that I can't redraw them by hand. If someone has already made the conversion save me some effort and speak up now while I go and get some food. Simon On 7/26/06, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Starting to look good. I still have the source for the verview/cpp/java > imagesI made tbased on David's diagram. Problem is they are visio > diagrams. I feel that I should attach to the JIRA for safe keeping but > haven't got rounf to try converting to another format. I will have a quick > look over the next 30 mins and give the new site a once over also. > > Regards > > Simon > > > On 7/26/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I may be miss interpreting or reading too much in what you stated. But I > > kindly request that patches and updates be to the > > tuscany\sandbox\site\site-author files. That they've been run through > > the build tool ok using the tuscany\sandbox\site\build script. It's not > > > > needed to include in the patch/update the site-publish. > > > > Also I'd like to get the source for the images checked in so others can > > edit. And a few lines what tools (openoffice?) was or could be used to > > edit them maybe a readme in the images directory. > > Thanks > > > > kelvin goodson wrote: > > > I'll try to get some more SDO content done in any spare moments while > > > here > > > at OSCon. I've reformatted the SDO Java overview that's currently on > > the > > > WIKI so that its suitable for dropping in, but I haven't got time to > > > fix up > > > all the links riight now, so hopefully I'll put a patch up later > > today. > > > > > > On 26/07/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Rick, > > >> > > >> This is a major improvement over what we currently have and I really > > >> like how things have been cleaned up and streamlined. I'm sure I will > > >> have some suggestions in the furture but I agree this should be > > >> published ASAP assuming others agree. > > >> > > >> Some minor comments that we may want to consider at some point later > > on: > > >> > > >> 1. In the Java projects section, splitting things down a bit further > > >> among SCA, DAS and SDO. I think we should make it more apparent the > > >> technologies may be used as well as built independently. Within SCA, > > >> I think we may want to split this even further between extensions and > > > > >> core at some point. > > >> > > >> 2. On the Java graphic, we should list more hosting platforms at some > > >> point (e.g. J2EE app servers, OSGi, whatever) > > >> > > >> Jim > > >> > > >> > > >> On Jul 26, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Rick wrote: > > >> > > >> > I've added in the news, and moved reporting bugs as suggested, > > >> > added a link to the blog and fixed several bad links. > > >> > I didn't want the left menu to become cluttered, so I didn't put > > >> > in the runtime stuff since I was thinking that information would > > >> > be added to the individual Java, C++, DAS etc content pages. > > >> > I'm of a different opinion, I think we should now get this sandbox > > >> > site up live and use the opportunity that the OSCON BOF gives us to > > >> > get first hand feedback. What's the worse that can come of it ? > > >> > People don't like this either? Well should that be the case its > > >> > best to get that information now before we make it "absolutely > > >> > perfect". > > >> > I'm really opposed to starting another effort of producing a hybrid > > > > >> > of the two in a mad dash which is not where we wanted to go in the > > >> > first place. > > >> > > > >> > Luciano Resende wrote: > > >> >> I took sometime today to evaluate what's available today on the > > >> >> live tuscany > > >> >> website and what's being proposed as part of Tuscany-568. > > >> >> Looks like couple page links on the Tuscany-568 are still not > > >> >> implemented ( > > >> >> e.g page not found), but I'm assuming these issues are going to be > > >> >> fixed, so > > >> >> I concentrate on areas that are available today and missing on the > > >> >> new site > > >> >> structure. > > >> >> > > >> >> Categories: > > >> >> > > >> >> Tuscany: Looks like the new proposed site gets rid of News and > > >> >> Documentation > > >> >> sections, and adds License, ASF, Javadoc and TCK > > >> >> > > >> >> SCA Runtime for Java : Missing on the new site structure > > >> >> > > >> >> SDO for Java : Missing on the new site structure > > >> >> > > >> >> Relational Data Access Service for Java : Missing on the new site > > >> >> structure > > >> >> > > >> >> Sca Runtime for C++ : Missing on the new site structure > > >> >> > > >> >> SDO for C++: Missing on the new site structure > > >> >> > > >> >> Community: Reporting bugs moved to development (altough i think > > >> >> comunity in > > >> >> general is interested on this as well), Requirements missing, > > >> >> Commiters and > > >> >> Documentation section added > > >> >> > > >> >> Development: Java project, C++ Project and Building the site > > >> >> sections are > > >> >> missing. Added Roadmap, Source code, Code standards (link to > > >> >> wiki), Issue > > >> >> tracking (moved from Comunity) and dependencies > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> As I think the main idea was to incorporate user feedback that our > > >> >> website > > >> >> had too many text and very little images, diagrams, etc I have the > > > > >> >> following > > >> >> suggestion to get a new and improved version on-line for OSCON > > >> >> timeframe : > > >> >> > > >> >> - Maintain the current website outline navigation structure (the > > > > >> >> one > > >> >> available today on live tuscany website) > > >> >> - Replace the main page with the one proposed on Tuscany-568 > > >> >> - Add an overview page for each module ( e.g DAS overview with > > >> >> DAS diagram > > >> >> and high level object diagram), and the main page diagram would > > >> >> link to this > > >> >> module overview page > > >> >> - On the SCA, SDO and DAS section on the left panel, remove the > > >> >> "release" > > >> >> link as they all point to same main download page. > > >> >> > > >> >> With this, i think we could still get an improved version of the > > >> >> site in a > > >> >> short period of time, and then still continue on improvements > > >> >> later on. > > >> >> > > >> >> - Luciano > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
