Yea this is definitely simpler than a side file. I came across this
but never tried it out a few years back:
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/anoras/archive/2004/08/09/21502.aspx
Apparently it provides a way to "introspect" the script to retrieve
Javadoc style annotations but the way you have may be better and
simpler.
Jim
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:08 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've had a go at adding support for introspection of JavaScript
components
and wondered if anyone had any comments.
As JavaScript is untyped and doesn't have the concept of
annotations its not
possible to have this work as well as with Java components. How
I've done it
is to have the script define a object named SCA which defines the
component
configuration.
There's a sample introspectable script at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/
containers/container.javascript/src/test/resources/org/apache/
tuscany/container/javascript/function/IntrospectableHelloWorld.js
There'd be nested objects defining any references and properties,
and WSDL
interfaces could be described something like:
SCA = {
'wsdlServiceName' : 'myservice'
'wsdlPortName' : 'myPort'
}
Comments? I think this makes script components simpler than using the
.componentType side file, but what do others think?
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
