http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/09/ spring_integration_weblogic_server.html?page=1

I have had a quick look at the MedRec sample using Spring and JPA, we use Spring with Hibernate JPA at work. Spring's JPA support is terrific.
Yea they did a really nice job. I'd also like to get JPA support (OpenJPA and Hibernate) into Tuscany as well. It would be nice to be able to get this from multiple component types as well (e.g. Groovy) in addition to Java. This could be done using the annotation processing framework. I've spoken with Patrick Linskey from the OpenJPA project and he said he'd be happy to help answering questions we had. It would also be nice to get Hibernate in as well. Let me know if you're interested.

One thing I like about taking an existing application is it shows how SCA can be used to add value to technology people already know.
Absolutely, that is one of the key sellers of SOA as well, ability to reuse your existing assets.
I also think there should be another "pure SCA" sample as well. Unfortunately, BigBank has gotten really bloated and I would like to see just an SCA version.

Let me know if you are interested in helping out or providing input on MedRec. For the "pure sample" maybe we could start outlining what specific scenarios we want to show?
I am interested in helping out, is that a Tuscany initiative? On the pure sample, shall I create a JIRA and we can elaborate it further?
For the pure sample, sure go ahead and create a JIRA. We could keep the name "BigBank" or change it to do something else. Let me know what you prefer and then we can start with scenarios we want to enable.

On the MedRec stuff, Chris is working on getting something he can submit as a patch. I believe he is in the midst of some web service binding issues but it would be great to get some help once he has a patch as well.

Jim


Jim



On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:48 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:

Jeremy,

I think it is important to have a realistic application that demostrates the key capabilities of SCA as a technology. From, that perspectice focus should be on how SCA can be an SOA enabler, in terms of integrating systems built on disparate platforms using a variety of technologies and exposing existing software assets though new channels.

If we can build an application with a coherent set of use cases that will demonstrate a set of container types and bindings working together, it would demostrate the capabilities of SCA as a technology and Tuscany as an implementation. I don't know how much the big bank sample fits the bill, however, if it is realistic enough, we can build a realistic sample using the big bank scenarios. From that angle we can look at,

1. The components involved in realising the solution
2. Container types for each component. For example, some components will be in Java, some other will use a scripting language, some will be realised as database stored procedures etc. 3. Define the appropriate binding types for integrating these components together and exposing their services to external clients.

The application should demonstrate the following capabilities,

1. Different container types working together
2. Different binding types
3. Ability to enforce policies to realise enterprise-level QoS aspects.

The application with proper documentation on the implementation architecture and model would be a good demonstrator for using SCA as a technology platform for realising SOA.

Ta
Meeraj


From: Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Sample framework
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:53:55 -0700

We have had a rapid increase in the number of samples recently many of which do essentially the same thing. Some feedback from M1 also said that we seemed to have invented the greatest number of varieties of HelloWorld but that it was hard to tell if SCA could do anything else. I'd like to propose a change in how we structure the samples so that we make it clearer to illustrate the technology to users.

Rather than having separate projects for each technology variant, I'd like to suggest we have just a couple of projects that provide a framework and then have instructions in the documentation for each technology that clearly show how to apply it.

For example, I can see two framework environments:
a) a client environment with a simple command line client wires together a couple of local components b) a webapp environment with a simple JSP client that also wires together a couple of local components

Then, for example, the JavaScript extension could say:
To illustrate the use of JavaScript as a component, take the client a) and 1) replace <implementation.java class="Foo"/> with <implementation.javascript script="foo.js"/>
  2) Install javascript extension
  2) rebuild/run sample

Or, to illustrate the WebService binding:
Server
  1) Take webapp and add <service><binding.ws ...>
  2) Install Axis binding extension
  3) Deploy server app to Tomcat
Client
1) Take client application and replace <component name="foo" ...> with <reference><binding.ws ...>
  2) Install Axis binding extension
  3) Run client

The basic idea being, have a common framework and the instructions on how to use the particular extension.
--
Jeremy

------------------------------------------------------------------- --
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
The new Windows Live Toolbar helps you guard against viruses http:// toolbar.live.com/?mkt=en-gb


-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to