I agree that the names are confusing. Would you like to see more meaningful names like
tuscany-binding-axis2-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar .... tuscany-sca-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar tuscany-sca-core-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ... tuscany-idl-wsdl-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar etc. ? On 8/25/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Rick also suggested this a while back, maybe we should raise a JIRA this time so its not forgotten. ...ant On 8/25/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a list of JARs we're building: > > axis2-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > spring-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > celtix-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > groovy-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > rmi-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > core-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > spi-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > wsdl-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > > Don't we think the name of the jars are misleading? Can we tell these jars > from tuscany project? The groupId makes them unique for the maven > repository > but it seems to be wierd when we copy these jars into some folders. > > I propose that we restore the naming convention we had in M1: add > "tuscany-" > as a prefix to the artifactId. > > Do you agree? > > Thanks, > Raymond > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Warm regards, jojo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
