Good point.
So it could be:
a) http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/1.0
or
b) http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/databinding/sdo/1.0
Which one do you prefer?
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Budinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Change the namespace of "import.sdo" to
"http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sdo/1.0"
Hi Raymond,
Since it's actually a tuscany sca extension, did you mean to have sca in
the namespace, instead of sdo.
Frank.
"Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/18/2006 12:59:46 PM:
Hi,
The "import.sdo" element is now under http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0
namespace. I propose to change it to
http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sdo/1.0
to reflect the fact that "import.sdo" is a tuscany extension to SCDL.
If there are no objections, I'll make the changes.
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]