Good point.

So it could be:

a)  http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/1.0
or
b) http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/databinding/sdo/1.0

Which one do you prefer?

Thanks,
Raymond

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Budinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Change the namespace of "import.sdo" to "http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sdo/1.0";


Hi Raymond,

Since it's actually a tuscany sca extension, did you mean to have sca in
the namespace, instead of sdo.

Frank.


"Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/18/2006 12:59:46 PM:

Hi,

The "import.sdo" element is now under http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0
namespace. I propose to change it to
http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sdo/1.0
to reflect the fact that "import.sdo" is a tuscany extension to SCDL.

If there are no objections, I'll make the changes.

Thanks,
Raymond


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to