I have no preference but if sdo.import is not handled in the core framework, it would probably be best defined in a more specific namespace - like option b).
Frank. "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/18/2006 02:00:22 PM: > Good point. > > So it could be: > > a) http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/1.0 > or > b) http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/databinding/sdo/1.0 > > Which one do you prefer? > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frank Budinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10:22 AM > Subject: Re: Change the namespace of "import.sdo" to > "http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sdo/1.0"; > > > > Hi Raymond, > > > > Since it's actually a tuscany sca extension, did you mean to have sca in > > the namespace, instead of sdo. > > > > Frank. > > > > > > "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/18/2006 12:59:46 PM: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> The "import.sdo" element is now under http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0 > >> namespace. I propose to change it to > > http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sdo/1.0 > >> to reflect the fact that "import.sdo" is a tuscany extension to SCDL. > >> > >> If there are no objections, I'll make the changes. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Raymond > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
