Are there any plans at the moment for binding.sca in the Java
codebase? One of the obvious uses for binding.sca in Tuscany is to
connect up the Java and C++ codebases..

Andy

On 9/22/06, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sebastien,

This sounds like a good approach to me.

Yours,  Mike.

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's about time that we implement the SCA <binding.sca>
> "default" binding, about 10 months after the publication of the initial
> SCA spec v0.9 :)
>
> As far as I can remember all discussions on the subject, the idea has
> always been to reuse the Web Service binding for this, with some
> simplifying assumptions and good defaults (WS-I basic profile,
> doc-lit-wrapped, no need to specify a WSDL binding or even a WSDL
> interface).
>
> Reusing the Web Service binding extension code is probably the simplest
> at this point but will create a dependency between this new
> extensions/sca binding and the existing extensions/ws. I think it's OK
> for now as our Web Service binding extension is still very light weight
> and we can assume that people looking at Tuscany for an SOA runtime will
> want the Web Service extension in the distribution. So if there's no
> objection I'm planning to just do that: reuse the Web Service binding
> extension and implement the SCA default binding extension as a thin
> layer on top of it.
>
> In the longer term the Web Service extension will probably grow (to
> support more WS profiles, SOAP versions, WS policies etc.) so we'll have
> to find a better solution and maybe carve out of the Web Service
> extension a small subset that can be shared between the two extensions
> or just used by the SCA default binding extension.
>
> Dos that plan sound OK? Any thoughts?
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to