I don't quite understand. <binding.sca> is in the SCA 0.96 spec.
Are you suggesting that <binding.sca> should be removed from the
SCA spec? Has this been brought up to the SCA assembly spec workgroup?
Are you saying that you are not going to implement a default
binding (with or without a <binding.sca> element) in Tuscany/Java?
or just that you're not going to support <binding.sca>?
I'm open to entertaining the idea of having it removed from the spec
as long as there is a way for people to have the runtime select a
physical binding. Assuming it is not removed, on the question of what
the actual physical manifestation of binding.sca is for Tuscany/Java,
I would prefer that be left to configuration. I don't want to require
bundling a web services stack with every distribution and would like
to avoid the question of which stack would be selected. I would also
like to give people more options, for example choosing an optimized
binary protocol since interop can be covered through binding.ws.
Jim
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
