On Oct 10, 2006, at 6:54 AM, ant elder wrote:
Yes that seems to fix it so I've committed a fix to correct that.
Thanks!
Any reason why its not <groupId> like in a regular maven dependency
element?
The names reflect the underlying API.
This is not a Maven <dependency> element and may be used to access
artifacts from repos that are not Maven based. The syntax does not
support all of Maven's capabilities.
If we want to couple this to Maven then I think we should support the
actual element from the Maven namespace.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
