Simon,
I think the standalone repo constructs the path to the artifact in a local
maven repo from group, artifact and version to find the artifact url.
However, it doesn't do any transitive stuff.
If you want to use transitive resolution you can use
org.apache.tuscany.services.maven.MavenArtifactRepository. However, it has
only been tested in a webapp host.
Ta
Meeraj
From: Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question on the Tuscany <dependency> extension in SCDL
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:35:43 +0100
Jeremy,
I'm sorry that I need to reply to your question with a question.
This is because I can't answer your question until I'm clear on
the following.
How does the simple scheme work today? For example, the SCDL in the
helloworldwsclient standalone jar has the following:
<tuscany:dependency>
<group>axis2</group>
<artifact>axis2-core</artifact>
<version>SNAPSHOT</version>
</tuscany:dependency>
How does the standalone environment currently translate this group,
artifact and version information into the name and location of the
dependency artifact that it will load?
Simon
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Depends on the repo.
In the webapp we have a maven based repo implementation that supports
transitive deps based on maven metadata in the artifact or in an
accompanying pom (at least, I think this is what Meeraj's thing does).
In the standalone env we are currently using a simpler repo that does not
support transitive deps or remote downloads. Promoting to do that should
just be a matter of changing the repo impl to the same maven one as used
in the webapp.
Should we do that?
--
Jeremy
On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jeremy.
For the following XML fragment in the default.scdl for binding.axis2,
<dependency xmlns="http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/1.0-SNAPSHOT";>
<group>axis2</group>
<name>axis2-kernel</name>
<version>SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
Is it transitive? For example, axis2 has dependencies on wsdl4j and
XmlSchema. Would these artifacts be resolvable at runtime without
explicit declarations?
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Simon C Nash IBM Distinguished Engineer
Hursley Park, Winchester, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Windows LiveĀ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free!
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
