In the webapp we have a maven based repo implementation that supports transitive deps based on maven metadata in the artifact or in an accompanying pom (at least, I think this is what Meeraj's thing does).
The webapp repo looks at packaged jars in WEB-ING/tuscany/repository to resolve the dependencies transitively and falls back to a local Maven repo, if it can't resolve the dependencies from the packaged JARS.

Ta
Meeraj


From: Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question on the Tuscany <dependency> extension in SCDL
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:54:15 -0700

Depends on the repo.



In the standalone env we are currently using a simpler repo that does not support transitive deps or remote downloads. Promoting to do that should just be a matter of changing the repo impl to the same maven one as used in the webapp.

Should we do that?
--
Jeremy

On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:

Hi, Jeremy.

For the following XML fragment in the default.scdl for binding.axis2,

<dependency xmlns="http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/1.0-SNAPSHOT";>
   <group>axis2</group>
   <name>axis2-kernel</name>
   <version>SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>

Is it transitive? For example, axis2 has dependencies on wsdl4j and XmlSchema. Would these artifacts be resolvable at runtime without explicit declarations?

Thanks,
Raymond

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to