On 11/29/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29/11/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > We have two C++ clients in the C++ Bigbank and Calculator samples. > > (1) Real SCA clients, which call the Bigbank and Calculator components > directly. > > (2) Axis2C based Web Service clients, which do not use SCA at all to > invoke the sample Web Services. > > Since these samples are there to illustrate the SCA programming model > more than the Axis2C programming model, I'm wondering if it woudn't be > better to change the Axis2C based clients (2) to use SCA references with > WS bindings instead. > > What do you think? I guess these are showing a simple incoming request. I think we should remove the WS client form Caclulator completely (see other thread) and leave it as a binding.cpp sample only. -- > Pete
In that case what we would loose a basic binding.ws sample in CPP. I would vote for adding C++ SCA WS clients and for ditching the Axis specific ones. Alternatively we could create a ws calculator separately to provide the "is it working" check. Simon
