On 29/11/06, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/29/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 29/11/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We have two C++ clients in the C++ Bigbank and Calculator samples. > > > > (1) Real SCA clients, which call the Bigbank and Calculator components > > directly. > > > > (2) Axis2C based Web Service clients, which do not use SCA at all to > > invoke the sample Web Services. > > > > Since these samples are there to illustrate the SCA programming model > > more than the Axis2C programming model, I'm wondering if it woudn't be > > better to change the Axis2C based clients (2) to use SCA references with > > WS bindings instead. > > > > What do you think? > > > I guess these are showing a simple incoming request. I think we should > remove the WS client form Caclulator completely (see other thread) and > leave > it as a binding.cpp sample only. > > > > -- > > Pete > > In that case what we would loose a basic binding.ws sample in CPP. I would vote for adding C++ SCA WS clients and for ditching the Axis specific ones. Alternatively we could create a ws calculator separately to provide the "is it working" check. Simon
I agree with what I think you are saying ;-) Axis clients go to the bin and are replaced with SCA ws binding samples -- Pete
