Jeremy, on the face of it that sounds logical but I don't really know the code that well. I'd like to understand the full extent of the function, particularly whether in both directions of the mappings (WSDL2Java and Java2WSDL) we could substitue the "word" SDO for the word Java and still convey the full meaning of the capabilities of the classes. I've had a quick peek but haven't yet conclusively got to the point where I can clearly see whether this is true. Perhaps someone who knows the code can offer or point to at a description of the function.
Regards, Kelvin. On 19/12/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at modularizing the tree, it seems to me that the tools and java2wsdl/wsdl2java plugins don't actually have any dependency on SCA - they are tools for generating java/wsdl interfaces with SDO DataObjects. In light of that, I think they might be better off as part of the SDO tree - does anyone have any issues with moving them there? -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
