Hi Mike, How do we create JIRAs against spec on osoa site? Should we just create JIRAs in Tuscany using specification category instead?
Thank you, Haleh ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Dec 22, 2006 7:00 AM Subject: Re: IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect and @ConversationID To: [email protected] Sure, I'm just not sure about the details. At the JIRA site there does not seem to be an OSOA-related project that I can find. And at the OSOA site (www.osoa.org), there does not seem to be a away to submit a JIRA. Needless to say, I have not done this before :-) On 12/22/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: > I noticed that IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect uses > getAllPublicAndProtectedFields to obtain the fields on > which to invoke each processor's visitField. However, > the C&I spec seems to imply that it should be possible > to inject a conversation id (the spec still refers to it as > @SessionID but that's another matter) into a private > field. I've already changed @SessionID in the latest version of the spec. The other issue regarding private fields is a bug in the spec - it should be protected or public. Could you file a JIRA at the OSOA site so we don't loose track of that? Thanks, Jim > Should IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect be changed > or is the spec wrong in its assumption? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
