Jim Marino wrote:
In the spec group we have a JIRA installation set up. This requires access to the spec lists, which I believe can be obtained by joining the collaboration (Mike, correct me if I'm wrong about how to obtain access). I would prefer we keep the spec-related JIRAs in one place if possible.

Jim

On Dec 31, 2006, at 1:50 PM, haleh mahbod wrote:

Hi Mike,

How do we create JIRAs against spec on osoa site?
Should we just create JIRAs in Tuscany using specification category instead?

Thank you,
Haleh

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 22, 2006 7:00 AM
Subject: Re: IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect and @ConversationID
To: [email protected]

Sure, I'm just not sure about the details. At the JIRA site there does
not seem to be an OSOA-related project that I can find. And at the
OSOA site (www.osoa.org), there does not seem to be a away to
submit a JIRA. Needless to say, I have not done this before :-)


On 12/22/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:

> I noticed that IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect uses
> getAllPublicAndProtectedFields to obtain the fields on
> which to invoke each processor's visitField. However,
> the C&I spec seems to imply that it should be possible
> to inject a conversation id (the spec still refers to it as
> @SessionID but that's another matter) into a private
> field.
I've already changed @SessionID in the latest version of the spec.
The other issue regarding private fields is a bug in the spec - it
should be protected or public. Could you file a JIRA at the OSOA site
so we don't loose track of that?

Thanks,
Jim

> Should IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect be changed
> or is the spec wrong in its assumption?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



What we've done so far is:
- Create a JIRA issue in the Tuscany JIRA / Specification category
- Assign it to a member of the OSOA collaboration to drive its resolution with the OSOA spec group
- Record the resolution in the Tuscany JIRA issue

This allows us to track the spec issues that Tuscany cares about in our public JIRA system, even before OSOA accepts them as actual spec issues, associate the issues with the other impacted Tuscany components and issue categories, and to raise them to the OSOA folks just point them to the public JIRA issue link.

What's important here is that all members of the Tuscany community have access to all the issues created by the Tuscany project.

--
Jean-Sebastien


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to