Hi Luciano, Is it working for you now ?
regards Hasan On 1/3/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It should work now, as I changed it yesterday. Did you sync to the latest repo and clear out you local repo? Also, if there is more than one service offered by the composite it the getService() method will return null and a target not found exception should be thrown. It's possible I may have missed something so let me know if you still have the problem. Jim On Jan 3, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Hi Jim, are you still working on this ? I'm getting the same issue on > java/samples/sca/webapp > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > On 1/2/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> For now I specified the target service in the SCDL. I think we should >> keep it like that in the sample as picking the default service in a >> composite is fragile and not really best practice. I'll work on >> getting rid of the NPE in a bit as it is a fairly simple fix. >> >> Jim >> >> On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Jim Marino wrote: >> >> > Yes that's right. I'll fix it in a bit. >> > >> > Jim >> > >> > On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I ran into a NPE with the latest code in the InnerComposite >> >> sample. Please see the stack trace below. >> >> >> >> java.lang.NullPointerException >> >> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.hash >> >> (ConcurrentHashMap.java:172) >> >> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get >> >> (ConcurrentHashMap.java:745) >> >> at >> >> >> org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.getServi >> >> ce(CompositeComponentExtension.java:252) >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:616) >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:503) >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.handleReference >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:430) >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.builder.ConnectorImpl.connect >> >> (ConnectorImpl.java:90) >> >> at >> >> >> org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.prepare( >> >> CompositeComponentExtension.java:368) >> >> at >> >> >> org.apache.tuscany.spi.extension.CompositeComponentExtension.prepare( >> >> CompositeComponentExtension.java:370) >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.deployer.DeployerImpl.deploy >> >> (DeployerImpl.java:98) >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.core.launcher.LauncherImpl.bootApplication >> >> (LauncherImpl.java:213) >> >> at org.apache.tuscany.test.SCATestCase.setUp(SCATestCase.java:88) >> >> at innercomposite.InnerCompositeTestCase.setUp >> >> (InnerCompositeTestCase.java:31) >> >> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:125) >> >> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) >> >> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) >> >> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) >> >> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118) >> >> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208) >> >> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203) >> >> at >> >> >> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run( >> >> JUnit3TestReference.java:128) >> >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run >> >> (TestExecution.java:38) >> >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:460) >> >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:673) >> >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:386) >> >> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main >> >> (RemoteTestRunner.java:196) >> >> >> >> In this case, the qualified name for the target is the component >> >> name and the portName is null and a NPE is thrown. >> >> >> >> The SCA spec defines the following syntax for wire-target-URI: >> >> >> >> <component-name>/<service-name> >> >> o where the target is a service of a component. The specification >> >> of the service name is optional if the target component only has >> >> one service with a compatible interface >> >> >> >> If service-name is not present (portName==null), we should check >> >> and pick the only one service. Am I right? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Raymond >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
