Hi,
As the first step, I have filed a JIRA issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1107) to request to create a
space for Tuscany on the CWIKI site. Once it's created, we can start to play
with it and then decide if we should move.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
I like the idead of a single (wiki based) site; it would be better than
having the current problem of overlap between wiki and website - as per
the
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09447.htmlthread...
If CXF have found it to work for them I think it would be a great
plan
On 06/01/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Marino wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> For quite a while the Confluence wiki was not maintained by ASF
>> infrastructure - it was very much use at your own risk. There may be
>> enough people using it now that that may have changed but it would be
>> worth finding out.
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tuscany wiki is currently hosted at
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany which is backed by MoinMoinWiki. I
>>> personally found it's not very productive to work this wiki.
>>> Recently I tried Confluence wiki and it seems to be more attractive:
>>>
>>> * Better look and feel and you can even customize the schemes
>>> * Easier to use, for example, CWIKI supports "Rick Text" editing in
>>> addtion to "Wiki Markup"
>>> * Export to PDF/word/HTML
>>> * Comments
>>> * And more ...
>>>
>>> Apache has a CWIKI set up @ http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence. You
>>> can see more details at
>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index. Quite a few
>>> projects use it to maintain their web sites and documentations.
>>>
>>> Should we request a space for Tuscany and migrate our existing
>>> contents over? We can take this chance to better organize our
>>> materials.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Raymond
>>>
> I'd be in favor of this given Jeremy's point above. Perhaps we could
> use CXF as a template to do this since it is very clean and nicely
> organized?
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/
>
> Jim
>
>
+1
On a related note the CXF approach resolves the constant dilemma between
'Project home page' and 'Wiki', as their home page is a Wiki! It would
be worth asking them what they think about the approach they've taken
and if they're happy with it and recommend it to others.
Thoughts?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
