+1 for moving to cwiki. Much easier to use.
On 2/7/07, Rick Rineholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have found having too many sources 2 wikis, the web site, doco
checked
> in to svn to be a major confusion and a general appearance
> disorganization. I think we should at the very least now retire one of
> the wiki sites. I'm for moving to cwiki.
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I guess the website and the wiki are both needed and am very much in
> line
> > with Dan's thoughts on what should go into each of this.
> >
> > I guess its now a question of whether we want to move our content
out of
> > that old wike over CWIKI. I'd say we must go with CWIKI which is a
> > lot more
> > pleasant to look and feel.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dan Murphy wrote:
> >> > Similar to Haleh's opinion... a hybrid of web and wiki seems to
make
> >> > sense
> >> > - use the web site for fairly static content but link from the
> >> website
> >> > directly to appropriate places in the wiki where the content is
> likely
> >> to
> >> > change or hasn't fully been decided yet.
> >> >
> >> > For example, we could remove the "how to build, test and deploy
Java
> >> SCA"
> >> > off of the web site and instead link from the web page to a wiki
> page.
> >> > (IMHO) it becomes easier to maintain... perhaps if/when it
settles
> >> > down (or
> >> > @ V1) we could merge it back into the web site. I'd be happy to
help
> >> > maintain this because I can edit the wiki - for me to
contribute to
> >> > the web
> >> > site takes much more effort... perhaps this isn't so important to
> >> > others who
> >> > are already committers...
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> > On 07/02/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Rick had asked earlier "Two concerns come to mind if we make THE
> >> >> website:
> >> >> Is it backed up? can we get past revisions if needed ? Currently
> our
> >> >> website is
> >> >> in svn which covers that.
> >> >> The other is we have had past complaints that the site was not
> >> "fancy"
> >> >> organized
> >> >> etc, are we confident this wiki can handle this?"
> >> >>
> >> >> Is Confluence backed up regularly?
> >> >>
> >> >> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and
move all
> >> >> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs,
release
> >> >> information and downloads, etc.
> >> >>
> >> >> It took us a while to get the website look and feel to where
it is
> >> right
> >> >> now
> >> >> and this is not the part that needs to be changed that often. We
> >> should
> >> >> not
> >> >> move it until we have a good replacement.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2/6/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi Kelvin,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki -
> >> >> > CWIKI. Infact
> >> >> > some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for
> >> SCA M3,
> >> >> some
> >> >> > documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found
place
> >> >> there.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >
> >> >> > - Venkat
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > As I'm updating a page on our old wiki, I'm wondering where
> >> we are
> >> >> with
> >> >> > > this and whether I should be migrating the content?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Kelvin.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > On 24/01/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Hi,
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > FYI, I have added "edit" permissions to all registered
users.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> >> > > > Raymond
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> > > > From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> > > > To: <[email protected]>
> >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:59 AM
> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: Move Tuscany wiki to Apache CWIKI?
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > > On 1/23/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > <snip>
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > 2) I'm not proposing to change the "edit" policy. The
> >> >> > > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ page also provides some
> >> >> guidances
> >> >> > for
> >> >> > > > >> cases
> >> >> > > > >> that we use it as a sandbox (open to all registered
> >> users) or
> >> >> > > > >> documentation
> >> >> > > > >> site (open to folks with CLA on file).
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > I also think all our content should be open to any
> registered
> >> >> user.
> >> >> > We
> >> >> > > > > want
> >> >> > > > > everyone to help maintain it and thats going be more
> >> likely to
> >> >> > happen
> >> >> > > if
> >> >> > > > > we
> >> >> > > > > make it easy for them. Its harder for users to send in
> >> >> patches for
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > > > > wiki
> >> >> > > > > :) Can we get update emails sent to the dev list so we
> >> all can
> >> >> > > monitor
> >> >> > > > > the
> >> >> > > > > changes?
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > ...ant
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> Looks like a number of projects have already moved their web
sites to
> >> confluence, including Cayenne, Cxf, Qpid, Directory, Mina, Ode,
> >> ServiceMix, Felix, Yoko, Wicket...
> >>
> >> The whole list is there:
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dashboard.action
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Sebastien
> >>
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
