On Feb 20, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

On Feb 20, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Jim Marino wrote:

I temporarily added support for monitoring using JDK logging in the standalone server. I'd like to change this to using log4j as the default. What do people think?

I thought you didn't like additional dependencies? :-)

I agree we should add a MonitorFactory for log4j but are the advantages enough that we should make it the default?

I generally don't and I like to be able to say we only depend on StAX :-) but performance of JDK logging is pretty abysmal . We could change it after the release. What do you think?

Jim

--
Jeremy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to