On Mar 5, 2007, at 2:40 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
Hi Jim,
The thoughts behind the SDO CTS being off the top page was that the
CTS was
not meant to endorse the Tuscany SDO implementation... So, to make
it clear
that SDO CTS was not part of the SDO implementation it was made a
separate
call out in the nav bar... however, this was when the dual web & wiki
approach was still being used. I guess, assuming Tuscany still
desires the
SDO CTS then we should probably consider re-instating the top level
link....
wdyt ?
Hi Dan,
I thought the CTS was related to the SDO impl (i.e. both are "SDO-
related") and not a another "top-level" sub-project so I moved it
under there. We could easily move it back up. Or, do you think we
could create the SDO sub-page such that it contains both the SDO
impl and SDO CTS with wording they are independent? I'm happy to also
move it back up if it makes more sense but was trying to keep the
initial page small and reflective of the sub-projects we have.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
