On 3/12/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Simon Nash wrote: > I think this is a direction worth exploring. As Jim says, we need to > develop these thoughts in more detail to understand the benefits of > making these changes. Just to be sure, I didn't say it was worth exploring. I'm just trying to understand what is being proposed as it is not clear at all. > A useful way of doing this would be to look > at some use cases and see how the current design handles these, and > what would be different with a restructured/modularized/componentized > kernel. > My advice would be to take the approach of focusing on how your proposals benefit the community and, in particular, the areas people are currently working on.
Lets remember we are all part of the community and all the area's currently being worked on includes all the things in the sca-java-integration branch. It looks like Sebastien has started prototyping these changes now, thats in the sca-java-integration branch, i guess it doesn't matter where its done right now but I really hope as soon as anything comes of this we start moving bits to trunk to be refined further there as it would be vastly better for Tuscany if we could find a way to get things back together again. I'm +1 in principle to whats being proposed and I'd like to help with the prototyping work. ...ant
