[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481166
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1177:
-----------------------------------------
I agree that the CTS should not be expecting DoucmentRoot to be returned.
However, I'm not sure that the opposite is also true - i.e., that the CTS
should ensure that "DocumentRoot" is not returned.
The SDO spec is intentially vague about where global properties live. In
Tuscany, we use "DocumentRoot" as the container Type for all the global
properties in a given namespace. My first thought is that the CTS should
tolerate extra implementation-dependent types (like DocumentRoot) to be
returned. Do you see any problems with that?
> CTS should not expect DocumentRoot to be included in results from
> XSDHelper.define()
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1177
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SDO Community Test Suite
> Reporter: Andy Grove
>
> DocumentRoot was mentioned in SDO 2.0.1 and was only relevant to XML
> documents without an XSD. All mentioned of DocumentRoot were removed from SDO
> 2.1 and the CTS should not be expecting DocumentRoot to be returned by
> XSDHelper.define().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
