I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the
project, I don't know how I hadn't thought about it. Because the main reason
to create a new project in VS solution is to avoid the compilation errors
from those many classes that are not completed implemented.
But also because I wanted to keep the previous implementation, for example,
of the class ReadCommandImpl that was reimplemented in das_lite project.
With diferent versions of classes we can define what is already implemented
completely(das_lite project) and what remains to be implemented(das_runtime
project).
I think we could try another approach where we could move the classes from
the das_runtime to a trunk or something like and the classes that we are
actually implementing from the das_lite(cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/)
project to the das_runtime(cpp/das/runtime/core/src) project and continuing
implementing from there.
What do you think?
Adriano Crestani
On 3/15/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Adriano
I was looking into your patch, and realized you had created a new
project
located at (cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) instead of continuing to work
on
(cpp/das/runtime/core/src). I tought that from a previous quick discussion
we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather then
a
new project.
I have couple questions :
- Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ?
- What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite ?
- Is this new project a small subset of files that were duplicated
from cpp/das/runtime/core/src ? If so, is there a way to have one project
but only compile/use the subset of files required, maybe just not adding
them to the VS project ?
I'll wait after clarification on this subject before I apply the patch.
If anyone else have other thoughts/questions, please let me know.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adriano Crestani (JIRA) <[email protected]>
Date: Mar 15, 2007 10:39 AM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command
classes
To: [email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140:
--------------------------------------
Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch
- Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite
- Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl
classes
- Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not working
correctly
- Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely
implemented yet
> Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: C++ DAS
> Affects Versions: Wish list
> Reporter: Adriano Crestani
> Assigned To: Adriano Crestani
> Fix For: Wish list
>
> Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch
>
>
> Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and
ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
