Are you talking about das_lite here ? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/das/VSExpress/tuscany_das/
Does it still look like I missed something ? Let me know... -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 3/19/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've done a checkout and when I opened the C:\Adriano\Faculdade\Tuscany\Tuscany\CPP\DAS\VSExpress\tuscany_das\das_runtime\das_runtime.sln solution, it has only the das_runtime project and the das_lite project doesn't apper :s, did you remove it from the solution or I forgot to include the file on the patch? I think you should copy all the files I sent to you into the repo. Adriano Crestani On 3/16/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have just applied your patch. At some point, once we get things more > stable, we should decide witch way to go, and maybe promote the das_lite > to > just c++ das. For now this should be OK. > > BTW, I liked Pete's comments : "keep DASing ;-)" > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > On 3/15/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the > > project, I don't know how I hadn't thought about it. Because the main > > reason > > to create a new project in VS solution is to avoid the compilation > errors > > from those many classes that are not completed implemented. > > > > But also because I wanted to keep the previous implementation, for > > example, > > of the class ReadCommandImpl that was reimplemented in das_lite project. > > With diferent versions of classes we can define what is already > > implemented > > completely(das_lite project) and what remains to be > > implemented(das_runtime > > project). > > > > I think we could try another approach where we could move the classes > from > > the das_runtime to a trunk or something like and the classes that we are > > actually implementing from the das_lite(cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) > > project to the das_runtime(cpp/das/runtime/core/src) project and > > continuing > > implementing from there. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Adriano Crestani > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Adriano > > > > > > I was looking into your patch, and realized you had created a new > > > project > > > located at (cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) instead of continuing to > work > > > on > > > (cpp/das/runtime/core/src). I tought that from a previous quick > > discussion > > > > > > we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather > > then > > > a > > > new project. > > > > > > I have couple questions : > > > - Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ? > > > - What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite > ? > > > - Is this new project a small subset of files that were > > duplicated > > > from cpp/das/runtime/core/src ? If so, is there a way to have one > > project > > > but only compile/use the subset of files required, maybe just not > adding > > > them to the VS project ? > > > > > > I'll wait after clarification on this subject before I apply the > > patch. > > > If anyone else have other thoughts/questions, please let me know. > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende < > http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Adriano Crestani (JIRA) <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> > > > Date: Mar 15, 2007 10:39 AM > > > Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite > > Command > > > classes > > > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > > > > > > > > > [ > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > > > ] > > > > > > Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140: > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch > > > > > > - Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite > > > > > > - Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl > > > classes > > > > > > - Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not > > working > > > > > > correctly > > > > > > - Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely > > > implemented yet > > > > > > > Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes > > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Key: TUSCANY-1140 > > > > URL: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140 > > > > Project: Tuscany > > > > Issue Type: Sub-task > > > > Components: C++ DAS > > > > Affects Versions: Wish list > > > > Reporter: Adriano Crestani > > > > Assigned To: Adriano Crestani > > > > Fix For: Wish list > > > > > > > > Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch > > > > > > > > > > > > Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and > > > ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram: > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093 > > > > > > -- > > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > > - > > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >
