Those are the ones. You said before that you thought this might be
generated but that you were sure Frank would confirm. He has not done
so.
What seems odd to me is that if this was generated then I would have
expected consistent text to have been produced by the generator.
Instead we have things like:
+ * $Id: BasicExtendedMetaData.java,v 1.26 2006/04/29 11:45:28 emerks
Exp $
and
+ * $Id: XSDEcoreBuilder.java,v 1.71 2006/08/15 16:04:41 emerks Exp $
which correlate directly to headers found in files in the Eclipse
repo. This makes the provenance of the code uncertain which is why we
need clarification of what happened.
--
Jeremy
On Mar 18, 2007, at 8:34 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
I think you are freferring to commit r513560 .* *There was no code
copied
from eclipse. The EMF generator puts an eclipse header in to
generated code
by default. That code was simply the result of using that generator
against
our own schemas.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 17/03/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not to be a party-pooper, but what was the outcome with the code
copied from Eclipse?
--
Jeremy
On Mar 15, 2007, at 8:42 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> I have posted an SDO Java M3 release candidate here:
> http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/M3/RC1/ <http://
> people.apache.org/%7Erobbinspg/M3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/
~robbinspg/M3-RC1/>
>
>
> Please take a look at this and try it out, so that I can pick up
> any errors
> quickly and move towards a vote on a proper release in the short
term.
>
> Thanks, Kelvin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
