Hi Frank,
OK - Sounds good - I'll study up on my SDO concepts a little more - and
look at how we can make it work.
I did donate it to EMF on bugzilla already as well
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=173226
Cheers,
- Ole
Frank Budinsky wrote:
Hi Ole,
Sounds interesting, but unless you want to reimplement the idea as an
SDOType2SDOType model (independent of EMF), Tuscany is not the right home.
Tuscany is an SDO implementation, which currently happens to have a
dependency on EMF. It uses Ecore in restrictred and specialized ways, and
the goal, over time, is to decrease the dependence on EMF. An EMF-specific
(Ecore) mapping model would not be appropriate at Tuscany.
Have you considered contributing it to the EMFT (EMF Technology) project
at Eclipse? EMFT is the intended home for new EMF-based technologies.
Frank
Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/17/2007 07:15:38 PM:
Hi,
I've created an Ecore2Ecore Model and Processor.
I was wondering if this might find a home in Tuscany?
The model maps one ecore model to another.
It's different from the Eclipse implementation (Thought it was tricky to
use),
but I tried to reuse the naming of objects as much as possible.
The processor will take a source model instance and create the
corresponding target model.
Here is the URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/sandbox/oersoy/rpm.
factory.all/ecore2ecore.model.parent
Cheers,
- Ole
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
