Here's my own +1 On 18/03/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18/03/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 18/03/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Andrew Borley wrote: > > > On 3/16/07, Pete Robbins < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > >> > > >> Please vote to approve the release of milestone 3 of Tuscany SCA > > Native > > >> and > > >> Tuscany SDO C++. > > >> > > >> The SDO release includes performance improvements (30-40%) along > > with > > >> improvements to robustness. > > >> The SCA release includes support for C++, Python and Ruby languages > > and > > >> sca, > > >> webservice and REST bindings. > > >> > > >> The distribution artifacts are here: > > >> > > >> - linux and Mac OS X (source only) - > > >> http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/linux-macosx/ > > >> - windows (source and binary) - > > >> http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/win32/ > > >> > > >> The RAT tool output for the release artifacts is here: > > >> http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/ > > >> > > >> The SDO release is tagged here > > >> > > >> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/cpp-sdo-1.0.incubating-M3-RC1/ > > >> > > >> The SCA release is tagged here > > >> > > >> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/native-sca-1.0.incubating-M3-RC4/ > > >> > > >> > > >> Thank you. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Pete > > >> > > > > > > I've gone through the Windows bin & src distros. All the samples > > work > > > happily & docs look good (but I would say that, I wrote half of > > 'em!) > > > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > > > Cheers > > > Andy > > > > > > > I tested the SDO and SCA source distributions on Redhat Enterprise > > Linux > > 4. I have a few minor comments and one issue. > > > > I built SDO with build_sdocpp.sh then I built SCA with > > build_scanative.sh, all went well. > > > > I was surprised to not find a script to build the SCA samples, then a > > little confused as I had to rebuild the whole sample tree (with > > configure then make) for each sample. It may be good to package the > > samples/build.sh script, maybe as a build_samples.sh, and point to it > > from samples GettingStarted.html? > > > > The docs look very good and all the samples work like a charm - this > > time I didn't forget to install the Python feedparser library so the > > AlertAggregator sample worked the first time :) > > > > I think it would be nice to have links to the sample REST service URLs > > in the REST sample docs, as one of the point of having REST services > > is > > that you can invoke them right from your Web browser. > > > > The only real issue I found is that the AlertAggregator README.html is > > missing from the Linux distribution. > > > > So the release looks very good, I'll be +1 with it if we add the > > missing > > README.html, the other things are just small improvements that can be > > done later. > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > Thanks. I found the same thing with the samples build and was going to > add in a "build all" script as only the cpp samples require pre-reqs(cpp > compile), the others are simple deploy scripts. I think this is actually a > fair bit more work though as it hits the doc etc.... which is why I left it > out for this release. > > I will refresh the distro with the missing Readme. > > Cheers, > > -- > Pete > I have refreshed the linux/mac distro woth the missing README.html Cheers, -- Pete
-- Pete
