Similarly I don't understand the inclusion of asm since its scope is
"provided"
<dependency>
<groupId>asm</groupId>
<artifactId>asm</artifactId>
<version>2.2</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
<optional>true</optional>
</dependency>
On 21/03/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yang,
I've been battling with Maven trying to remove the junit jar from the
archive. As far as I can see it seems to be a (spurious?) transitive
dependency coming in from the plugin project's dependency on
org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-descriptor:jar (see attached html file) --
but so far my edits to the poms have failed to remove the jar from the
distro,. Any suggestions most welcome.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 20/03/07, Yang ZHONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agree with Ant, we probably don't need jUnit into the binary distro.
> At the same time, do we really need ASM?
>
> On the other hand, roughly I see 2 kinds of audience:
> 2-1. developers who participate in development. I guess they might lean
> to
> work upon the source repository instead of the release
> 2-2. users who don't participate in development yet. I guess they
> concern
> binary distro much more than the source counterpart
> If users are the majority of the *release* audience, it'll be nice to
> make
> sample build easy against binary distro.
> Currectly, I have to do some work to build sample.
>
> I see some errors running the samples:
> 1. NullPointerException @ CreateDataObjectFromXmlString.java:153
> 2. ClassCastException @ ObtainingDataGraphFromXml.java:156
> 3. NullPointerException @ PurchaseOrderControl.java:438 (option 13)
>
> On 3/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/15/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have posted an SDO Java M3 release candidate here:
> > >
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/M3/RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/M3/RC1/>
> <
> > > http://people.apache.org/%7Erobbinspg/M3-RC1/>
> > >
> > > Please take a look at this and try it out, so that I can pick up any
>
> > > errors
> > > quickly and move towards a vote on a proper release in the short
> term.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Kelvin.
> > >
> >
> > Looks pretty good to me. The binary distro includes JUnit, do you
> really
> > need that? If so you need to add it to the LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> Also
> > should probably include the ASM copyright in the NOTICE file.
> >
> > ...ant
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Yang ZHONG
>
