Yes and I very faintly remember this to be the reason why we moved the specs out to where it is now. Isn't it ?
- Venkat On 4/5/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was under the impression that the spec-sca-api-r1.0 module would be a stable one unless the spec changes. Isn't right that, under spec/ we can have multiple sca releases based on the same spec-sca-api-r1.0, but moving it to /modules we will be forced to have a spec api release every time we release sca ? On 4/5/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > For SCA, I suggest that we further move it to "modules/spec-sca-api-r1.0 ". > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:36 AM > Subject: Re: Build update, was: SCA source tree and build structure > > > > Bert Lamb wrote: > >> Just to note, in order for this build to work from a fresh empty maven > >> local repo, you'll need to run "mvn" from the /java/spec/sca-api-r1.0 / > >> directory first. > >> > >> -Bert > >> > > > > Good point. I had forgotten to commit my change to java/sca/pom.xml to > > include the spec-api in the top-down build. It's now fixed in revision > > r525846. > > > > Also, I'm not sure it's obvious to everybody that the SCA API is hiding > > under java/spec instead of being under the java/sca folder. Similar > > comment for the SDO API. > > > > How about moving java/spec/sca-api-r1.0 to java/sca and > > java/spec/sdo-api to java/sdo as well? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
