+1 As for DAS, as it has dependencies on SDO, I'd propose to follow the same name convention as SDO, and use beta1 as well.
On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote: > What are we going to be calling this next SCA release? > > We've had M1 and M2 releases, some alpha kernel releases, DAS are talking > about an M3 release and SDO is doing an M3 release although there was > some > discussion about renaming that to beta1. I think milestone and alpha > release > names may discourage people from trying a release as it makes it sound > unstable. The spec defined SCA APIs are stable now and we're talking > about > making stable SPIs for this next release, so the Tuscany externals are > becoming stable and that sounds better than alpha quality to me. > > So how about the next Tuscany SCA release is named beta1? and we could > try > to get DAS and SDO to also follow that naming? > > Any comments or alternative name suggestions? > > ...ant > Good idea, beta1 makes sense to me as APIs and SPIs are getting stable, as is our support for the SCA assembly XML described in the SCA 1.0 spec. +1 from me. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
