On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip] Simon Laws wrote: > >> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding >> >> >> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi. >> We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the RMI binding. The tuscany-rmi module defines an RMI hosting extension point, similar to how the tuscany-http module provides an HTTP host extension point. To make that clear, I'd suggest to rename tuscany-rmi to tuscany-host-rmi and tuscany-http to tuscany-host-http. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are right. I didn't spot that. I must be going blind. Agree with the
move to using host in the name. Simon
