+1 for controlled commits. If people will ensure no commits on Thursday after about 24.00Hrs Pacific Time (US and Canada), I can go ahead and change the core-spi packages to include 'sca'. Ant, please let me know if there are other things that I can help with. I am also going to start looking at getting the spec-api itest to work.
Thanks - Venkat On 5/9/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Raymond Feng wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tried a bit to rename some of the packages (not adding sca yet) but > > I just realized that it became a bit out of control with the flood of > > check-ins. > > > > Maybe the best way is that we agree on the naming convention for the > > core-spi and core and then have one person to do all the refactoring > > in one shot once we see a functionally stable code base. > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Venkata Krishnan" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:48 PM > > Subject: Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release > > > > > >> Hi.. .what about the workitem related to renaming the core-spi to > >> include > >> 'sca' for packages. Is it a good time to do this ? Thanks > >> > >> - Venkat > >> > >> On 5/4/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > ant elder wrote: > >>> > > There's been a lot of progress, things are starting to look good > >>> and > >>> > most > >>> > > things on the wiki page ( > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents > >>> > >>> > ) > >>> > > > >>> > > look like they're nearing completion. So I think what we should > >>> do is > >>> > > aim at > >>> > > creating an SVN branch for the release around Tuesday next week, > >>> > > start > >>> > > being > >>> > > more controlled about what changes go into the branch and start > >>> > > publishing > >>> > > candidate distributions from that, then when we think it looks > >>> ok > > vote > >>> > on > >>> > > the final release candidate from that, hopefully by the end of > next > >>> > week. > >>> > > Does this sound ok to everyone? It does mean most changes anyone > >>> > > wants > >>> > in > >>> > > should be tried to be committed by Tuesday. > >>> > > > >>> > > The latest distribution downloads to try out are available at: > >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/ > >>> > > > >>> > > There's now a Java-SCA-0.90 version in Jira so any bugs found or > >>> things > >>> > > people want to get done should be added there: > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > ...ant > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > +1 from me. Like you said a lot of what we had on the Wiki are near > >>> > completion. One of the most important items I think is to complete > >>> the > >>> > clean up of the code base and simplify further some of our > interfaces > >>> > for extensions, but Tuesday looks reasonable to me. > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Jean-Sebastien > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > > >>> > Sounds like a good timescale to me. Gives time to finish the sample > >>> builds > >>> and readmes. > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >> > > There has been many commits and good progress the last few days, so I > spent a little bit of time checking the status of the trunk. > > Here's a summary of what I found: > - The code cleanup is almost complete, I think there's a little bit work > left to refactor one last .spi. package, remove a few dead classes, also > it looks like Raymond has started to clean up the Scope registry and > WorkContext I'm not sure if it's finished or not. > - The Java, Script and RMI extensions are now stable, as well as the > sample implementation, binding, and data binding extensions. > - It looks like we have a reasonable Web app story with a servlet > context listener, but it may require a little bit of cleanup to avoid > confusion with sca-contribution.xml. I'm also not sure if it allows to > expose Web Services from a Web app, or if we even want to do that now. > > Main todo's that I could think of: > - Port the Web Service binding extension to the latest code, as it's > really important to have, and is also used by many integration tests. > - Run RAT and check licenses and notices. > - Check why the itest/spec-api test cases are failing. > - Create a JAR containing the source of our runtime, to help debugging > in an IDE. > - Are the samples build.xml finished? > - I have ported the Spring extension to the latest code but need to do a > little bit of cleanup tomorrow before committing it. > - I'm not sure about the JSONRPC binding, wouldn't it be nice to have it > too? > - Lazy loading of our modules to avoid loading too many dependencies > when using tuscany-sca-all.jar. > - Rename the packages to *.sca.* but I would suggest to delay this to a > later point some time next week after our first RC. > > And there's probably a few more :) > > -- > Jean-Sebastien We've made tons of progress on all these things so the release is looking really close to being ready and the time approaching to either cut a branch or switch to a more controlled commit mode on the trunk. Hopefully we could do this tomorrow, so this is just a fyi to start getting all your last minute changes in... ...ant
