With all the package name changes and SPI cleanup that have been completed over the weekend things are looking pretty good now. I'd like to aim for cutting an 0.90 branch this Wednesday and from then only the only changes that go into that branch are ones that we need to do to get the release votes through.
There's still things to be done, all the discussion going on about the sample builds needs to be finished, and there's a whole lot of open JIRA's that we need to either get fixed or postpone to the next release. (If you have something that needs to get fixed for 0.90 raise a jira so it doesn't get missed). Lets use the mailing list and the weekly IRC chat at 4:30pm today to work out which of these we need to get fixed for 0.90 or which can be postponed. Open JIRAs targeted for 0.90: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 ...ant On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, thanks for putting up. I am done with the renaming of the core module. Now you are free to commit as you will. - Venkat On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am just about to start the next iteration of renaming. So here is > another request to refrain from commits till I come back on the ML. Thanks > again for co-operating :) > > - Venkat > > On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, thank you all for being really patient. This iteration of > > refactoring is now over and committed. But looks like I am going to come > > back with similar requests if people are ok to name the other modules as > > well > > > > Thanks > > > > - Venkat > > > > On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi.. I have made some progress with the renaming. Since there are > > > changes across modules, I request that there are no commits till I get back > > > on the ML and state that is ok to commit. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok. I am starting with the renaming of the packages for the core-spi > > > > module. Thanks > > > > > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > > > On 5/11/07, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 to starting with the package renames on Friday. > > > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > > > On 5/10/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for controlled commits. If people will ensure no commits on > > > > > Thursday > > > > > > after about 24.00Hrs Pacific Time (US and Canada), I can go > > > > > ahead and > > > > > > change > > > > > > the core-spi packages to include 'sca'. Ant, please let me know > > > > > if there > > > > > > are other things that I can help with. I am also going to start > > > > > looking > > > > > > at > > > > > > getting the spec-api itest to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/9/07, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raymond Feng wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried a bit to rename some of the packages (not adding > > > > > sca yet) > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > I just realized that it became a bit out of control with > > > > > the flood > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > check-ins. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe the best way is that we agree on the naming > > > > > convention for the > > > > > > > > > core-spi and core and then have one person to do all the > > > > > refactoring > > > > > > > > > in one shot once we see a functionally stable code base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Raymond > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Venkata Krishnan" > > > > > > > > > < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > To: < [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:48 PM > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi.. .what about the workitem related to renaming the > > > > > core-spi to > > > > > > > > >> include > > > > > > > > >> 'sca' for packages. Is it a good time to do this > > > > > ? Thanks > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> - Venkat > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On 5/4/07, Simon Laws < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > ant elder wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> > > There's been a lot of progress, things are starting > > > > > to look > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > >>> and > > > > > > > > >>> > most > > > > > > > > >>> > > things on the wiki page ( > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > ) > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > look like they're nearing completion. So I think > > > > > what we > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > >>> do is > > > > > > > > >>> > > aim at > > > > > > > > >>> > > creating an SVN branch for the release around > > > > > Tuesday next > > > > > > week, > > > > > > > > >>> > > start > > > > > > > > >>> > > being > > > > > > > > >>> > > more controlled about what changes go into the > > > > > branch and > > > > > > start > > > > > > > > >>> > > publishing > > > > > > > > >>> > > candidate distributions from that, then when we > > > > > think it looks > > > > > > > > >>> ok > > vote > > > > > > > > >>> > on > > > > > > > > >>> > > the final release candidate from that, hopefully by > > > > > the end of > > > > > > > > next > > > > > > > > >>> > week. > > > > > > > > >>> > > Does this sound ok to everyone? It does mean most > > > > > changes > > > > > > anyone > > > > > > > > >>> > > wants > > > > > > > > >>> > in > > > > > > > > >>> > > should be tried to be committed by Tuesday. > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > The latest distribution downloads to try out are > > > > > available at: > > > > > > > > >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/latest/> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > There's now a Java-SCA-0.90 version in Jira so any > > > > > bugs found > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > >>> things > > > > > > > > >>> > > people want to get done should be added there: > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > ...ant > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > +1 from me. Like you said a lot of what we had on the > > > > > Wiki are > > > > > > > near > > > > > > > > >>> > completion. One of the most important items I think is > > > > > to > > > > > > complete > > > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > > > >>> > clean up of the code base and simplify further some of > > > > > our > > > > > > > > interfaces > > > > > > > > >>> > for extensions, but Tuesday looks reasonable to me. > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > -- > > > > > > > > >>> > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > Sounds like a good timescale to me. Gives time to > > > > > finish the > > > > > > > sample > > > > > > > > >>> builds > > > > > > > > >>> and readmes. > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> Simon > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There has been many commits and good progress the last few > > > > > days, so I > > > > > > > > spent a little bit of time checking the status of the trunk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's a summary of what I found: > > > > > > > > - The code cleanup is almost complete, I think there's a > > > > > little bit > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > left to refactor one last .spi. package, remove a few dead > > > > > classes, > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > it looks like Raymond has started to clean up the Scope > > > > > registry and > > > > > > > > WorkContext I'm not sure if it's finished or not. > > > > > > > > - The Java, Script and RMI extensions are now stable, as > > > > > well as the > > > > > > > > sample implementation, binding, and data binding extensions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - It looks like we have a reasonable Web app story with a > > > > > servlet > > > > > > > > context listener, but it may require a little bit of cleanup > > > > > to avoid > > > > > > > > confusion with sca-contribution.xml . I'm also not sure if > > > > > it allows to > > > > > > > > expose Web Services from a Web app, or if we even want to do > > > > > that now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main todo's that I could think of: > > > > > > > > - Port the Web Service binding extension to the latest code, > > > > > as it's > > > > > > > > really important to have, and is also used by many > > > > > integration tests. > > > > > > > > - Run RAT and check licenses and notices. > > > > > > > > - Check why the itest/spec-api test cases are failing. > > > > > > > > - Create a JAR containing the source of our runtime, to help > > > > > debugging > > > > > > > > in an IDE. > > > > > > > > - Are the samples build.xml finished? > > > > > > > > - I have ported the Spring extension to the latest code but > > > > > need to do > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > little bit of cleanup tomorrow before committing it. > > > > > > > > - I'm not sure about the JSONRPC binding, wouldn't it be > > > > > nice to have > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > too? > > > > > > > > - Lazy loading of our modules to avoid loading too many > > > > > dependencies > > > > > > > > when using tuscany-sca-all.jar. > > > > > > > > - Rename the packages to *.sca.* but I would suggest to > > > > > delay this to > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > later point some time next week after our first RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And there's probably a few more :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've made tons of progress on all these things so the release > > > > > is > > > > > > looking > > > > > > > really close to being ready and the time approaching to either > > > > > cut a > > > > > > > branch > > > > > > > or switch to a more controlled commit mode on the > > > > > trunk. Hopefully we > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > do this tomorrow, so this is just a fyi to start getting all > > > > > your last > > > > > > > minute changes in... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
