[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500173
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-824:
--------------------------------------
There have been a lot of changes since this JIRA was opened. Basically, we have
switched to a mode that the runtime will try to recognize the databindings by
introspection without user annotations. There is one issue left and being
discussed on the ML to figure out if we need the @DataBinding annotation to
specify the interface/operation level databinding mapping.
Another issue is if interface.wsdl is used, usally a XML/java binding such as
SDO or JAXB is used by the java implementation class. We need to find the
corresponding databinding for the interface.wsdl in these cases.
I'll leave it open for now until we have a better view.
> DataBinding: Is it a concern of Programming Model vs. Assembly?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-824
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-M2
> Reporter: ant elder
> Assignee: Raymond Feng
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>
>
> There have been some question about the DataBinding framework and if it
> should be a concern of the Programming Model vs. Assembly?
> See: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08679.html
> and a follow up mention in:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09363.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
