Sorry, I'm having some restricted internet access as I'm traveling since last week... that's probably why we haven't created a DAS release candidate yet... but the community and I think that we are ready to have one.
Yes, the idea is to have a DAS beta1 dependency on SCA 0.91 on the following items: - implementation.das - implementation.data - some samples (maybe including the samples we didn't ship in 0.9) On 6/18/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What will be the relationship between SCA 0.91 and DAS? I have seen some discussions on the list about a DAS release. Will SCA 0.91 have this DAS release as a dependency? Simon Luciano Resende wrote: > I have updated the wiki [1] page with things that I'm working on, and > would like to have in 0.91 . > > As for the implementation.das question regarding it's canned derby db, > we recently created a db utility to create and populate the database, > and I have plans to integrate with it. > > [1] > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents > > > On 6/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Wow 571 license problems! after being clean for 0.90 just a month ago. >> >> One question this brings up is what is actually intended to be >> included in >> 0.91? There's been quite a few new extensions and demo's etc added >> recently >> but no one has said they want those included in 0.91. Should they be by >> default or should we just include things that are mentioned on the >> release >> wiki page? If so anyone else care to help clean things up, add missing >> license headers, check the distribution works and includes >> dependencies etc? >> The implementation.das is including an entire database in the src, is >> there >> any way that could be generated by the tests? >> >> ...ant >> >> On 6/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks Ant. So could we all please use this wiki page to put down >> things >> > that are going to be increments over 0.90. >> > >> > Also I run the RAT on the trunk - just java/sca and here is the >> report. I >> > intend to go and fix the missing headers just ahead of cutting the >> branch. >> > Before that if anybody would like to jump in and help with this, >> please feel >> > free do so. >> > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Esvkrish/RAT_0.91/RAT_0.91.txt> >> >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > - Venkat >> > >> > On 6/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Taking a branch around the 20th sounds ok to me. >> > > >> > > The high level things I'm focusing on for the 0.91 release are: >> > > >> > > - Simplification of using script components (working without >> > > .componentType >> > > side files) >> > > - First cut of the simpler binding/implementation SPI >> > > - clean up of ajax and jsonrpc bindings >> > > - The EJB binding >> > > >> > > I'd also said to someone on the user list I'd get WS services without >> > > wsdl >> > > working so will try to do that as well. >> > > >> > > Most of the code for those is close-ish to being done, though there's >> > > still >> > > a whole lot of related sample work to get done. >> > > >> > > I'd started a wiki page for 0.91 at >> > > >> > > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents >> >> > > >> > > ...ant >> > > >> > > On 6/13/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Thanks for the faith and encouragement. This is going to be my >> first >> > > > experience and I am sure of getting all the help from you folks to >> > > pull >> > > > this >> > > > off successfully. >> > > > >> > > > So, to start with, I propose to cut a branch around June 20th, >> > > 2007. If >> > > > people are ok with this, then all that we'd like to be a part of >> > > 0.91should >> > > > get in by then (June 20th, 2007). Does that work fine with >> everybody? >> > > > >> > > > Also, I'd also like to list down the significant additions / >> > > enhancements >> > > > over 0.90 for the Release Notes. You can state the item here on >> this >> > > > thread >> > > > and I will take care of recording it. >> > > > >> > > > - Venkat >> > > > >> > > > On 6/13/07, Simon Nash < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 from me too. I'm sure Venkat will do a fine job. >> > > > > >> > > > > Simon >> > > > > >> > > > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Simon Laws wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> Yeah, Venkat did loads on the last release. +1 from me for >> Venkat >> > > as >> > > > > >> 0.91 RM >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Simon >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 from me >> > > > > > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
