I have created a maintenance branch */incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo- cpp-pre2.1/* Work towards SDO 2.1 specification compliance will continue in HEAD.
Cheers, On 22/06/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As is shown by the analysis that Michael Yoder is doing, comparing SDO 2.1spec API vs Tuscany SDO C++ API, it is clear that there will be a fair amount of work involved in getting the Tuscany code in to shape. Some changes are fairly simple but others may need wide ranging changes in the way Tuscany SDO is implemented. This will not be done overnight. I'd like to propose that we cut a branch of the current code and start the 2.1 work in HEAD (or should the 2.1 work start in a branch?). I know the PHP SCA community are using a cut later than M3 with some fixes I have written and expect them to raise more problems from time to time, this is why I'd like a "maintenance" branch available while we work on a 2.1compliany implementation. Would anyone else (committer or not) like to help out with the 2.1 effort? Cheers, -- Pete
-- Pete
