[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pete Robbins updated TUSCANY-1375:
----------------------------------
Component/s: C++ Specification
Affects Version/s: Cpp-M3
adding specification component
> C++ SDO spec portability: C++ type definition API
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1375
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1375
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++ SDO, C++ Specification
> Affects Versions: Cpp-M3
> Environment: API issue - all platforms
> Reporter: Michael Yoder
>
> The Tuscany C++ SDO implementation has off-spec type definition classes which
> are used by SCA. These should be removed or used only internally by the
> implementation until or unless they can be incorporated into the
> specification.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Yoder
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:45 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: C++ SDO spec portability: C++ type definition API
> Hi,
> C++ Tuscany SDO extends type definition API with the off-spec classes
> PropertyDefinition and TypeDefinition, which are used externally by SCA.
> We also have found the C++ SDO specification type definition API lacking, and
> have added the Impl member function
> DataFactoryImpl::define(DataObjectPtr)
> to parallel the Java type definition API using DataObject's of Types
> commonj.sdo#Type and commonj.sdo#Property.
> Should a Jira be raised for these classes to be removed or kept internal to
> Tuscany C++ SDO? Is there API here that it would be good to present to the
> comittee?
> Thanks,
> Michael Yoder
> Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - HydraSDO
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
