My only concern is that, after we restricted access to our wiki, and
started using the process of JIRA or updates on the other wiki space,
the website contributions basically stopped. I think we had only one
JIRA created on this space.

On 7/13/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 7/13/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was referring to the following paragraph...
>
> "a CLA is required for cover substantial contributions for source.
therefore
> wiki karma must only be granted those with a CLA."

Yes but that doesn't mean that the converse is also true, ie just having a
CLA doesn't give the right to be granted wiki karma.


+1

> Robert also says later on :
>
> "a committer is essentially a developer with a CLA "

and also that "provenance needs to be established and oversight maintained"

> If we have control to who gets access, and we are covered, on the
> legal aspects, by having the CLA in place, we should be Ok.  What are
> your concerns here ?

As with the code, it requires more than just having a CLA to be granted
commit access to our SVN.

> The other two alternatives I see are :
>
>    - Make wiki patches, or copies from "ocpy of the website wiki"
>    - Make all website contributors a Tuscany committer

+1, both of these seem appropriate to me. People can raise JIRAs and do
proposed updates on the TUSCANYWIKI space, once they've proven themselves we
can vote them in as a website committer just like from code contributions.

   ...ant


--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to