On 7/16/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 7/16/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 for the release.
>
> I guess that we need to document the issue reported by
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1435 in the release note.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:06 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating RC3
>
>
> > Hi again :),
> >
> > Please review and vote on the 0.91 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA
for
> > Java. (RC3).
> >
> > The artifacts are available for review at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscany/0.91-rc3/
> >
> > This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports,
and
> > the
> > Maven staging repository.
> >
> > The SVN tag for the release is:
> >
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/0.91-rc3-incubating/
> >
> > - Comments on RC2 related to READMEs of samples have been fixed [1].
> > - License file in binary distribution now includes the missing BSD
> > license reported during IPMC review [2]
> >
> > Othere than these two there are no other changes made to this RC over
> > the previous one.
> >
> > [1] -
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg19690.html
> > [2] -
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg14615.html
> >
> > Looks ok to me - so here's my +1.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> +1 for the release.

Having looked at this now in the cold light of day we still aren't doing a
very good job of tracking fixed JIRA against releases. We've talked about
this before. I'll raise again in a separate thread.


Does that mean you're +1/-1 for this RC?

  ...ant

Reply via email to