missed the dev list CC...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 27, 2007 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name
for sdo api maven artifact
To: kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

When would you like to apply this? How about later on today and I'll do the
associated changes as well?

   ...ant

On 7/26/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> With JIRA being down I'm going to try to attach the SDO part of this
> change to this note.  This is the SDO patch for TUSCANY-1437.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On 19/07/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ok cool, ping me when you want to have a go and i'll help with the sca
> > bit then.
> >
> >    ...ant
> >
> > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ant,
> > >   sure,  I wasn't planning to do it right now,  but the fact that the
> > > JIRA
> > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up.  I did
> > > mention
> > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > immediately,
> > > and the effect would be more subtle,  but I forgot that aspect of the
> > > scenario when posting just now.
> > >
> > > Kelvin.
> > >
> > > On 19/07/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ant,
> > > >   sure,  I wasn't planning to do it right now,  but the fact that
> > > the JIRA
> > > > components changed caused me to post the note as a heads up.  I did
> > > mention
> > > > in the JIRA that we wouldn't necessarily see the build breaking
> > > immediately,
> > > > and the effect would be more subtle,  but I forgot that aspect of
> > > the
> > > > scenario when posting just now.
> > > >
> > > > Kelvin.
> > > >
> > > > On 19/07/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/19/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1437 a
> > > few days
> > > > > > back
> > > > > > with multiple components, touching DAS and SCA as well as SDO in
> > > order
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > it was understood that there were impacts on all these
> > > components.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The groupId for the API artifact needs to change to
> > > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sdoand the artifact-id to
> > > > > > tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1 . This change arose from feedback on the
> > > release
> > > > > > candidate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The branch for the SDO 1.0 release already has this renaming in
> > > place,
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > we need a coordinated effort in making this change in the trunk.
> > > A
> > > > > > knock on
> > > > > > effect of the change is that the api jar name has an additional
> > > > > > "tuscany-"
> > > > > > prefix on it, so scripts that set up classpaths might need to be
> > >
> > > > > > changed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The components on this JIRA have just been reset to
> > > SDO-Implem,  so
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > clear that I didn't communicate the cross component nature of
> > > the
> > > > > > issue very
> > > > > > well through that JIRA.  In the body of the JIRA I asked people
> > > > > > working in
> > > > > > the affected component areas to identify the places where this
> > > change
> > > > > > occurs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please feed back either in the JIRA or on this thread,  the
> > > places
> > > > > > which are
> > > > > > likely to break if we don't coordinate this change,  and better
> > > still
> > > > > > provide a patch for that area so that i can apply all the
> > > changes
> > > > > > synchronously.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It may not be so bad - if the artifacts with the old name remain
> > > in the
> > > > > maven repository then while that old api is compatible with the
> > > impl then
> > > > > things should still keep on working, shouldn't they? So that would
> > > give us a
> > > > > bit of leeway. Searching the SCA code base there's quite a lot of
> > > places
> > > > > needing change, I can help do that but would be good if it could
> > > be left
> > > > > till at least next week.
> > > > >
> > > > >    ...ant
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to