[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520469
]
gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1542:
----------------------------------------
My point is:
SCA_ClinetAndImplementationforBPEL_V100 mentioned relation between SCA and BPEL
as:
1. SCA->BPEL
2. BPEL->SCA
Our implementation-bpel module works as the first one.
The second one should be a module inside the BPEL runtime not inside Tuscany.
> BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1542
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Java SCA BPEL Implementation Extension
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
> Reporter: gengshaoguang
> Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>
>
> What I expect next is: extend a bpel engine, make it interact with Tuscany's
> sca binding. Of course any bpel engine might link wsdl naturaly. But in the
> latter case, we make no improvement to SOA tech. BPEL->SCA should work in a
> more direct way and more effect way. I think
> SCA_ClinetAndImplementationModelforBPEL_V100 has specified relevants at
> section 1.4 .
> I open this issue to arouse collaboration from all of you.
> Thanks.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
