Hi, I uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1371. If someone could review and apply it that would be great.
Thanks, Michael -----Original Message----- From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:47 PM To: Michael Yoder Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1371) C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop) [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371?page=com.atlassian.ji ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1371: ----------------------------------- Attachment: TUSCANY-1371.txt This patch updates the DataObject::getProperty methods to the 2.1 spec API. > C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: > C++ DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------------- > > Key: TUSCANY-1371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371 > Project: Tuscany > Issue Type: Bug > Components: C++ SDO, C++ Specification > Affects Versions: Cpp-M3 > Environment: API issue - all platforms > Reporter: Michael Yoder > Fix For: Cpp-Next > > Attachments: TUSCANY-1371.txt > > > The Tuscany C++ SDO specification interface introduces off-spec member function overloads for "getProperty". The SDO 2.1 spec introduces the member function: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop), whicfh should replace these functions. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Yoder > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 6:35 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: > DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop) Hi, In the > DataObject interface, these member functions are present which are not in the C++ 2.1 specification: > virtual const Property& getProperty(unsigned int index) = 0; > virtual const Property& getProperty(const char* prop) = 0; > virtual const Property& getProperty(const SDOString& prop) = 0; > Since the 2.1 spec now has "getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop)", would it be a good idea to file a Jira/patch to replace these member functions with it in the specification interface? > Thanks, > Michael Yoder > Rogue Wave Software - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer - > HydraSDO -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
