On 8/23/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for including it in the release. > > Simon > > ant elder wrote: > > > This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including > > implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of > Felix > > dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include > it. > > > > ...ant > > > > On 8/20/07, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Ant, > >> > >>I will take a look at the intermittent test failure in itest/osgi > >>-implementation. > >> > >> > >>Thank you... > >> > >>Regards, > >> > >>Rajini > >> > >>On 8/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>Hi SCA/OSGi-ers, > >>> > >>>Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in > moving > >>>this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release > >>>in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for > that. > >>>Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing > >>>implemention.osgi code has been moved off SNAPSHOTs to use Felix 1.0so > >>>we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests > still > >>>has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well). > >>> > >>> ...ant > >>> > >>> > >>>On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>>Hi SCA/OSGi-ers. > >>>> > >>>>I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with Nicole) > >>>>to > >>>>host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some time > >>>>to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in > >>>>particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts > >>>>ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing > >>>>OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA. > >>>> > >>>>Cheers, > >>>>Joel > >>>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM > >>>>To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > >>>>Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration > >>>> > >>>>Sebastien, > >>>> > >>>>Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA > >>>>contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is > >>>>complete. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Thank you... > >>>> > >>>>Regards, > >>>> > >>>>Rajini > >>>> > >>>>On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Bill Barnhill wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the > >>>> > >>>>SCA-OSGi > >>>> > >>>>>>integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions, > >>>> > >>>>using > >>>> > >>>>>>OSGi as > >>>>>>an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an > >>>> > >>>>extension > >>>> > >>>>>>mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry > >>>> > >>>>capabilities. > >>>> > >>>>>>I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and > >>>> > >>>>Graham > >>>> > >>>>>>have > >>>>>>been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under > >>>>>>contrib > >>>>>>with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding, > >>>>>>implementation) > >>>>>> > >>>>>>What do you think? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Hi Bill, > >>>>> > >>>>>That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different > >>>>>from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package > >>>> > >>>>them > >>>> > >>>>>as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded > >>>> > >>>>that > >>>> > >>>>>will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better > >>>>>jar/bundle dependency management. > >>>>> > >>>>>Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do > >>>> > >>>>you > >>>> > >>>>>have code that we can look at? > >>>>> > >>>>>Any questions or issues that we can help with? > >>>>> > >>>>>On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on > >>>> > >>>>supporting > >>>> > >>>>>the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the > >>>> > >>>>SCA > >>>> > >>>>>assembly spec) as OSGI bundles? > >>>>> > >>>>>Thanks > >>>>> > >>>>>-- > >>>>>Jean-Sebastien > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. > >>>>It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the > named > >>>>addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or > disclose > >>>>it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us > immediately > >>>>and then destroy it. > >>>> > >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > +1 to including it from me. Sample looks pretty good. Can we get some suitable words for the CHANGES file from someone about it.
Simon
