Simon Nash wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1
Paul
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
My pennyworth:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
that simplifies the development of service oriented applications and
provides a managed service-oriented runtime, based on the standards
defined by the OASIS OpenCSA group, for distribution at no charge to
the
public.
This captures the right points, but it feels to me that the insertion of
the extra words up front makes this sentence a little cumbersome, and the
plural/singular juxtaposition of "...a range of technologies that
simplifies..." jars a little, though it is strictly correct
grammatically.
How about the following reordering:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of
service oriented applications and provides a managed service-oriented
runtime, supporting a range of technologies and based on the standards
defined by the OASIS OpenCSA group, for distribution at no charge to the
public.
Simon
This looks good to me, I have a few comments and questions:
In addition to the programming model aspects, covered by "simplifies the
development of service oriented applications", how about adding
something to cover the deployment, configuration and management models?
Either add "service oriented networks" or at least change "development"
to "development and deployment"?
I'm not sure how "a range of technologies" further expands the scope of
what we're doing, as the OpenCSA standards already span a range of
technologies. Is it really necessary?
Do people want to say something about things we're doing that are not
covered by OpenCSA, the data access service work, the data binding work,
and the SCA implementation and binding extensions that are not covered
by OpenCSA? Are they all covered by the "based on the standards defined
by OpenCSA" statement since they are related to either SCA or SDO?
I think it worth pointing out that there will be support for a range of
technologies - both implementation kinds and protocol kinds -hence the
words I've added.
Yours, Mike.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
