For implementation.bpel, we need to finalize support for references,
and we might want to do introspection of the BPEL process.

On 10/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> ant elder wrote:
> >
> > - Fix nightly builds (looks like this may be going again now)
> >
>
> Yes it is.
>
> http://vmbuild1.apache.org/continuum/buildResults.action?projectGroupId=19&projectId=277
>
> [snip]
> > - Fix all the build issues (maven 2.0.6/2.0.7/JDK6/empty repository) so new
> > users building Tuscany have a good experience
> >
>
> After the changes I made last week I think this is now all fixed (except
> for JIRAs TUSCANY-1846 and TUSCANY-1847). I am currently building with
> Maven 2.0.7 and both JDK5 and JDK6.
>
> Could people please try other Maven combinations? 2.0.5, 2.0.6, and
> report any errors? Thanks.
>
> [snip]
> > - Get binding.jms and implementation.bpel more spec complete.
> > - For JMS maybe have a host-jms module so you don't have to start a separate
> > JMS server or can use the the Geronimo one if thats where Tuscany is running
> >
>
> What's missing in binding.jms and implementation.bpel? Could people
> working on these modules give a quick overview?
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to