Hi Raymond,

Here are the changes that I have done and to me they are all pretty isolated
and non-breaking.  I know this is a big list.  I'd be happy to commit them
over to the 1.0.1 branch myself, but I'd like to get a 'GO' from you before
I attempt that.

r587452, r587451, r586881, r586880, r586878, r586877, r584751, r584750,
r584064, r583790, r583789, r583788, r583786, r583784, r582882, r582633,
r582632, r581970, r581674, r579342, r579341, r579339, r579338, r579336

Thanks.

- Venkat

On 10/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > Ok some things I think would be good are:
> >
> > -the fix to prevent the servlet-api jar getting dragged in to webapps
> >
> > -the fix so src builds using JDK6 work
> >
> > -any fixes to get src distro builds with Maven 2.0.6 and 2.0.7 working
> (not
> > sure of the status are there any fixes we could have?)
> >
> > - some JIRAs are: TUSCANY-1791, 1787, 1795,1801, 1782, 1785, 1797, 1796,
> > 1790, 1786, 1800, 1859, 1855, 1848, 1823, 1839
> >
> > If we're to make an October release we'll need to be getting this done
> real
> > soon now, would it be easier if we all just started committing the
> fixes, at
> > least the trivial ones like those README update JIRAs?
> >
> >    ...ant
> >
> >
>
> Here are a few more non breaking changes from me (in addition to my
> other fixes to support JDK6 and Maven 2.0.7):
> - r585314 allowed embedded Tomcat to pick up changed to pages without a
> restart (very useful at dev time)
> - r583344 added missing dependencies to wsdl2java module
> - r583335 fixed TUSCANY-1801
> - r581132, r581135, r581136 added an extension point to schema extensions
> - r580397 renamed some Tuscany xsds
> - r580145 fixed implementation-script to get Ruby gems working
> - r579390 added missing dependency on wsdl2java
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to